Black Friday

Why Buy Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps From Passin1Day?

Having thousands of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate customers with 99% passing rate, passin1day has a big success story. We are providing fully Databricks exam passing assurance to our customers. You can purchase Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam dumps with full confidence and pass exam.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Questions

Question # 1
A Generative AI Engineer has created a RAG application which can help employees retrieve answers from an internal knowledge base, such as Confluence pages or Google Drive. The prototype application is now working with some positive feedback from internal company testers. Now the Generative Al Engineer wants to formally evaluate the system’s performance and understand where to focus their efforts to further improve the system. How should the Generative AI Engineer evaluate the system?
A. Use cosine similarity score to comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final generated answers.
B. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow’s built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.
C. Benchmark multiple LLMs with the same data and pick the best LLM for the job.
D. Use an LLM-as-a-judge to evaluate the quality of the final answers generated.


B. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow’s built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.

Explanation:

Problem Context: After receiving positive feedback for the RAG application prototype, the next step is to formally evaluate the system to pinpoint areas for improvement.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: While cosine similarity scores are useful, they primarily measure similarity rather than the overall performance of an RAG system.

Option B: This option provides a systematic approach to evaluation by testing both retrieval and generation components separately. This allows for targeted improvements and a clear understanding of each component's performance, using MLflow’s metrics for a structured and standardized assessment.

Option C: Benchmarking multiple LLMs does not focus on evaluating the existing system’s components but rather on comparing different models.

Option D: Using an LLM as a judge is subjective and less reliable for systematic performance evaluation.

OptionBis the most comprehensive and structured approach, facilitating precise evaluations and improvements on specific components of the RAG system.

Question # 2
A Generative AI Engineer has a provisioned throughput model serving endpoint as part of a RAG application and would like to monitor the serving endpoint’s incoming requests and outgoing responses. The current approach is to include a micro-service in between the endpoint and the user interface to write logs to a remote server. Which Databricks feature should they use instead which will perform the same task?

A. Vector Search
B. Lakeview
C. DBSQL
D. Inference Tables


D. Inference Tables

Explanation:

Problem Context:

The goal is to monitor theserving endpointfor incoming requests and outgoing responses in aprovisioned throughput model serving endpointwithin aRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application. The current approach involves using a microservice to log requests and responses to a remote server, but the Generative AI Engineer is looking for a more streamlined solution within Databricks.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: Vector Search: This feature is used to perform similarity searches within vector databases. It doesn’t provide functionality for logging or monitoring requests and responses in a serving endpoint, so it’s not applicable here.

Option B: Lakeview: Lakeview is not a feature relevant to monitoring or logging request-response cycles for serving endpoints. It might be more related to viewing data in Databricks Lakehouse but doesn’t fulfill the specific monitoring requirement.

Option C: DBSQL: Databricks SQL (DBSQL) is used for running SQL queries on data stored in Databricks, primarily for analytics purposes. It doesn’t provide the direct functionality needed to monitor requests and responses in real-time for an inference endpoint.

Option D: Inference Tables: This is the correct answer.Inference Tablesin Databricks are designed to store the results and metadata of inference runs. This allows the system to logincoming requests and outgoing responsesdirectly within Databricks, making it an ideal choice for monitoring the behavior of a provisioned serving endpoint. Inference Tables can be queried and analyzed, enabling easier monitoring and debugging compared to a custom microservice.

Thus,Inference Tablesare the optimal feature for monitoring request and response logs within the Databricks infrastructure for a model serving endpoint.


Question # 3
A Generative AI Engineer just deployed an LLM application at a digital marketing company that assists with answering customer service inquiries. Which metric should they monitor for their customer service LLM application in production?

A. Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time
B. Energy usage per query
C. Final perplexity scores for the training of the model
D. HuggingFace Leaderboard values for the base LLM


A. Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time

Explanation:

When deploying an LLM application for customer service inquiries, the primary focus is on measuring the operational efficiency and quality of the responses. Here's whyAis the correct metric:

Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time: This metric tracks the throughput of the customer service system, reflecting how many customer inquiries the LLM application can handle in a given time period (e.g., per minute or hour). High throughput is crucial in customer service applications where quick response times are essential to user satisfaction and business efficiency.

Real-time performance monitoring: Monitoring the number of queries processed is an important part of ensuring that the model is performing well under load, especially during peak traffic times. It also helps ensure the system scales properly to meet demand.

Why other options are not ideal:

B. Energy usage per query: While energy efficiency is a consideration, it is not the primary concern for a customer-facing application where user experience (i.e., fast and accurate responses) is critical.

C. Final perplexity scores for the training of the model: Perplexity is a metric for model training, but it doesn't reflect the real-time operational performance of an LLM in production.

D. HuggingFace Leaderboard values for the base LLM: The HuggingFace Leaderboard is more relevant during model selection and benchmarking. However, it is not a direct measure of the model's performance in a specific customer service application in production.

Focusing on throughput (inquiries processed per unit time) ensures that the LLM application is meeting business needs for fast and efficient customer service responses.


Question # 4
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application. What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?
A. Switch to using External Models instead
B. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees
C. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues
D. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues


B. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees

Explanation:

Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.

Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.

Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.

Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.

OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.

Question # 5
A Generative AI Engineer is creating an LLM-powered application that will need access to up-to-date news articles and stock prices. The design requires the use of stock prices which are stored in Delta tables and finding the latest relevant news articles by searching the internet. How should the Generative AI Engineer architect their LLM system?

A. Use an LLM to summarize the latest news articles and lookup stock tickers from the summaries to find stock prices.
B. Query the Delta table for volatile stock prices and use an LLM to generate a search query to investigate potential causes of the stock volatility.
C. Download and store news articles and stock price information in a vector store. Use a RAG architecture to retrieve and generate at runtime.
D. Create an agent with tools for SQL querying of Delta tables and web searching, provide retrieved values to an LLM for generation of response.


D. Create an agent with tools for SQL querying of Delta tables and web searching, provide retrieved values to an LLM for generation of response.

Explanation:

To build an LLM-powered system that accesses up-to-date news articles and stock prices, the best approach is tocreate an agentthat has access to specific tools (option D).

Agent with SQL and Web Search Capabilities:By using an agent-based architecture, the LLM can interact with external tools. The agent can query Delta tables (for up-to-date stock prices) via SQL and perform web searches to retrieve the latest news articles. This modular approach ensures the system can access both structured (stock prices) and unstructured (news) data sources dynamically.

Why This Approach Works:

SQL Queries for Stock Prices: Delta tables store stock prices, which the agent can query directly for the latest data.

Web Search for News: For news articles, the agent can generate search queries and retrieve the most relevant and recent articles, then pass them to the LLM for processing.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A (Summarizing News for Stock Prices): This convoluted approach would not ensure accuracy when retrieving stock prices, which are already structured and stored in Delta tables.

B (Stock Price Volatility Queries): While this could retrieve relevant information, it doesn't address how to obtain the most up-to-date news articles.

C (Vector Store): Storing news articles and stock prices in a vector store might not capture the real-time nature of stock data and news updates, as it relies on pre-existing data rather than dynamic querying.

Thus, using an agent with access to both SQL for querying stock prices and web search for retrieving news articles is the best approach for ensuring up-to-date and accurate responses.


Question # 6
A Generative AI Engineer has created a RAG application which can help employees retrieve answers from an internal knowledge base, such as Confluence pages or Google Drive. The prototype application is now working with some positive feedback from internal company testers. Now the Generative Al Engineer wants to formally evaluate the system’s performance and understand where to focus their efforts to further improve the system. How should the Generative AI Engineer evaluate the system?

A. Use cosine similarity score to comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final generated answers.
B. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow’s built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.
C. Benchmark multiple LLMs with the same data and pick the best LLM for the job.
D. Use an LLM-as-a-judge to evaluate the quality of the final answers generated.


B. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow’s built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.

Explanation:

Problem Context: After receiving positive feedback for the RAG application prototype, the next step is to formally evaluate the system to pinpoint areas for improvement.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: While cosine similarity scores are useful, they primarily measure similarity rather than the overall performance of an RAG system.

Option B: This option provides a systematic approach to evaluation by testing both retrieval and generation components separately. This allows for targeted improvements and a clear understanding of each component's performance, using MLflow’s metrics for a structured and standardized assessment.

Option C: Benchmarking multiple LLMs does not focus on evaluating the existing system’s components but rather on comparing different models.

Option D: Using an LLM as a judge is subjective and less reliable for systematic performance evaluation.

OptionBis the most comprehensive and structured approach, facilitating precise evaluations and improvements on specific components of the RAG system.


Question # 7
What is an effective method to preprocess prompts using custom code before sending them to an LLM?
A. Directly modify the LLM’s internal architecture to include preprocessing steps
B. It is better not to introduce custom code to preprocess prompts as the LLM has not been trained with examples of the preprocessed prompts
C. Rather than preprocessing prompts, it’s more effective to postprocess the LLM outputs to align the outputs to desired outcomes
D. Write a MLflow PyFunc model that has a separate function to process the prompts


D. Write a MLflow PyFunc model that has a separate function to process the prompts

Explanation:

The most effective way to preprocess prompts using custom code is to write a custom model, such as anMLflow PyFunc model. Here’s a breakdown of why this is the correct approach:

MLflow PyFunc Models:MLflow is a widely used platform for managing the machine learning lifecycle, including experimentation, reproducibility, and deployment. APyFuncmodel is a generic Python function model that can implement custom logic, which includes preprocessing prompts.

Preprocessing Prompts:Preprocessing could include various tasks like cleaning up the user input, formatting it according to specific rules, or augmenting it with additional context before passing it to the LLM. Writing this preprocessing as part of a PyFunc model allows the custom code to be managed, tested, and deployed easily.

Modular and Reusable:By separating the preprocessing logic into a PyFunc model, the system becomes modular, making it easier to maintain and update without needing to modify the core LLM or retrain it.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A (Modify LLM’s Internal Architecture): Directly modifying the LLM's architecture is highly impractical and can disrupt the model’s performance. LLMs are typically treated as black-box models for tasks like prompt processing.

B (Avoid Custom Code): While it’s true that LLMs haven't been explicitly trained with preprocessed prompts, preprocessing can still improve clarity and alignment with desired input formats without confusing the model.

C (Postprocessing Outputs): While postprocessing the output can be useful, it doesn't address the need for clean and well-formatted inputs, which directly affect the quality of the model's responses.

Thus, using an MLflow PyFunc model allows for flexible and controlled preprocessing of prompts in a scalable way, making it the most effective method.


Question # 8
A Generative AI Engineer is building a RAG application that will rely on context retrieved from source documents that are currently in PDF format. These PDFs can contain both text and images. They want to develop a solution using the least amount of lines of code. Which Python package should be used to extract the text from the source documents?
A. flask
B. beautifulsoup
C. unstructured
D. numpy


C. unstructured

Explanation:

Problem Context: The engineer needs to extract text from PDF documents, which may contain both text and images. The goal is to find a Python package that simplifies this task using the least amount of code.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: flask: Flask is a web framework for Python, not suitable for processing or extracting content from PDFs.

Option B: beautifulsoup: Beautiful Soup is designed for parsing HTML and XML documents, not PDFs.

Option C: unstructured: This Python package is specifically designed to work with unstructured data, including extracting text from PDFs. It provides functionalities to handle various types of content in documents with minimal coding, making it ideal for the task.

Option D: numpy: Numpy is a powerful library for numerical computing in Python and does not provide any tools for text extraction from PDFs.

Given the requirement,Option C(unstructured) is the most appropriate as it directly addresses the need to efficiently extract text from PDF documents with minimal code.


Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps
  • Up-to-Date Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps
  • Valid Questions Answers
  • Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate PDF & Online Test Engine Format
  • 3 Months Free Updates
  • Dedicated Customer Support
  • Generative AI Engineer Pass in 1 Day For Sure
  • SSL Secure Protected Site
  • Exam Passing Assurance
  • 98% Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Success Rate
  • Valid for All Countries

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps

Exam Name: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate
Certification Name: Generative AI Engineer

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps are created by industry top professionals and after that its also verified by expert team. We are providing you updated Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam questions answers. We keep updating our Generative AI Engineer practice test according to real exam. So prepare from our latest questions answers and pass your exam.

  • Total Questions: 45
  • Last Updation Date: 22-Nov-2024

PDF Price

$19.99
$55.99 Updates:

Engine Price

$25.99
$73.99 Updates:

PDF + Engine

$29.99
$84.99 Updates:


Up-to-Date

We always provide up-to-date Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps to our clients. Keep checking website for updates and download.

Excellence

Quality and excellence of our Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate practice questions are above customers expectations. Contact live chat to know more.

Success

Your SUCCESS is assured with the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions of passin1day.com. Just Buy, Prepare and PASS!

Quality

All our braindumps are verified with their correct answers. Download Generative AI Engineer Practice tests in a printable PDF format.

Basic

$80

Any 3 Exams of Your Choice

3 Exams PDF + Online Test Engine

Buy Now
Premium

$100

Any 4 Exams of Your Choice

4 Exams PDF + Online Test Engine

Buy Now
Gold

$125

Any 5 Exams of Your Choice

5 Exams PDF + Online Test Engine

Buy Now

About Us

Passin1Day has a big success story in last 12 years with a long list of satisfied customers.

We are UK based company, selling Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice test questions answers. We have a team of 34 people in Research, Writing, QA, Sales, Support and Marketing departments and helping people get success in their life.

We dont have a single unsatisfied Databricks customer in this time. Our customers are our asset and precious to us more than their money.

WE FEEL SATISFIED WHEN YOU GET SATISFIED!

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps

We have recently updated Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps study guide. You can use our Generative AI Engineer braindumps and pass your exam in just 24 hours. Our Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate real exam contains latest questions. We are providing Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps with updates for 3 months. You can purchase in advance and start studying. Whenever Databricks update Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam, we also update our file with new questions. Passin1day is here to provide real Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions to people who find it difficult to pass exam

Generative AI Engineer can advance your marketability and prove to be a key to differentiating you from those who have no certification and Passin1day is there to help you pass exam with Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps. Databricks Certifications demonstrate your competence and make your discerning employers recognize that Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate certified employees are more valuable to their organizations and customers.


We have helped thousands of customers so far in achieving their goals. Our excellent comprehensive Databricks exam dumps will enable you to pass your certification Generative AI Engineer exam in just a single try. Passin1day is offering Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate braindumps which are accurate and of high-quality verified by the IT professionals.

Candidates can instantly download Generative AI Engineer dumps and access them at any device after purchase. Online Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate practice tests are planned and designed to prepare you completely for the real Databricks exam condition. Free Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps demos can be available on customer’s demand to check before placing an order.


What Our Customers Say

Testimonial

Jeff Brown

Thanks you so much passin1day.com team for all the help that you have provided me in my Databricks exam. I will use your dumps for next certification as well.
Testimonial

Mareena Frederick

You guys are awesome. Even 1 day is too much. I prepared my exam in just 3 hours with your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps and passed it in first attempt :)
Testimonial

Ralph Donald

I am the fully satisfied customer of passin1day.com. I have passed my exam using your Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate braindumps in first attempt. You guys are the secret behind my success ;)
Testimonial

Lilly Solomon

I was so depressed when I get failed in my Cisco exam but thanks GOD you guys exist and helped me in passing my exams. I am nothing without you.