B. Increase the default limit for maxKBps in limits.conf.

Answer DescriptionExplanation: To ensure that high-velocity sources will not have forwarding delays to the indexers, the default limit for maxKBps in limits.conf should be increased. This parameter controls the maximum bandwidth that a forwarder can use to send data to the indexers. By default, it is set to 256 KBps, which may not be sufficient for high-volume data sources. Increasing this limit can reduce the forwarding latency and improve the performance of the forwarders. However, this should be done with caution, as it may affect the network bandwidth and the indexer load. Option B is the correct answer. Option A is incorrect because the sessionTimeout parameter in server.conf controls the duration of a TCP connection between a forwarder and an indexer, not the bandwidth limit. Option C is incorrect because the forceTimebasedAutoLB parameter in outputs.conf controls the frequency of load balancing among the indexers, not the bandwidth limit. Option D is incorrect because the phoneHomelntervallnSecs parameter in deploymentclient.conf controls the interval at which a forwarder contacts the deployment server, not the bandwidth limit.

A. Change f rozenTimePeriodlnSecs to a larger value.

Answer DescriptionExplanation: The correct answer is A. Change frozenTimePeriodInSecs to a larger value. This is a possible solution to reduce the need to thaw buckets, as it increases the time period before a bucket is frozen and removed from the index1. The frozenTimePeriodInSecs attribute specifies the maximum age, in seconds, of the data that the index can contain1. By setting it to a larger value, the Splunk administrator can keep the data in the index for a longer time, and avoid having to thaw the buckets frequently. The other options are not effective solutions to reduce the need to thaw buckets. Option B, changing maxTotalDataSizeMB to a smaller value, would actually increase the need to thaw buckets, as it decreases the maximum size, in megabytes, of an index2. This means that the index would reach its size limit faster, and more buckets would be frozen and removed. Option C, changing maxHotSpanSecs to a larger value, would not affect the need to thaw buckets, as it only changes the maximum lifetime, in seconds, of a hot bucket3. This means that the hot bucket would stay hot for a longer time, but it would not prevent the bucket from being frozen eventually. Option D, changing coldToFrozenDir to a different location, would not reduce the need to thaw buckets, as it only changes the destination directory for the frozen buckets4. This means that the buckets would still be frozen and removed from the index, but they would be stored in a different location. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, and options B, C, and D are incorrect.

A. Incorrect ulimit settings.
B. Insufficient disk IOPS.
C. Insufficient memory.
D. Running out of disk space.

Answer DescriptionExplanation: All of the options are possible causes of a crash in Splunk. According to the Splunk documentation1, incorrect ulimit settings can lead to file descriptor exhaustion, which can cause Splunk to crash or hang. Insufficient disk IOPS can also cause Splunk to crash or become unresponsive, as Splunk relies heavily on disk performance2. Insufficient memory can cause Splunk to run out of memory and crash, especially when running complex searches or handling large volumes of data3. Running out of disk space can cause Splunk to stop indexing data and crash, as Splunk needs enough disk space to store its data and logs4.

B. Set the Replication Factor based on allowed indexer failure.

Answer DescriptionExplanation:
The correct answer is B. Set the Replication Factor based on allowed indexer failure. This is a best practice for adding data resiliency to a single-site indexer cluster, as it ensures that there are enough copies of each bucket to survive the loss of one or more indexers without affecting the searchability of the data1. The Replication Factor is the number of copies of each bucket that the cluster maintains across the set of peer nodes2. The Replication Factor should be set according to the number of indexers that can fail without compromising the cluster’s ability to serve data1. For example, if the cluster can tolerate the loss of two indexers, the Replication Factor should be set to three1.
The other options are not best practices for adding data resiliency. Option A, setting the Replication Factor to 49, is not recommended, as it would create too many copies of each bucket and consume excessive disk space and network bandwidth1. Option C, always using the default Replication Factor of 3, is not optimal, as it may not match the customer’s requirements and expectations for data availability and performance1. Option D, setting the Replication Factor based on allowed search head failure, is not relevant, as the Replication Factor does not affect the search head availability, but the searchability of the data on the indexers1. Therefore, option B is the correct answer, and options A, C, and D are incorrect.

D. Estimate the maximum concurrent number of searches and divide by the number of CPU cores per search head.

Answer DescriptionExplanation:
According to the Splunk blog1, the best method for sizing or scaling a search head cluster is to estimate the maximum concurrent number of searches and divide by the number of CPU cores per search head. This gives you an idea of how many search heads you need to handle the peak search load without overloading the CPU resources. The other options are false because:

• Estimating the maximum daily ingest volume in gigabytes and dividing by the number of CPU cores per search head is not a good method for sizing or scaling a search head cluster, as it does not account for the complexity and frequency of the searches. The ingest volume is more relevant for sizing or scaling the indexers, not the search heads2.
• Estimating the total number of searches per day and dividing by the number of CPU cores available on the search heads is not a good method for sizing or scaling a search head cluster, as it does not account for the concurrency and duration of the searches. The total number of searches per day is an average metric that does not reflect the peak search load or the search performance2.
• Dividing the number of indexers by three to achieve the correct number of search heads is not a good method for sizing or scaling a search head cluster, as it does not account for the search load or the search head capacity. The number of indexers is not directly proportional to the number of search heads, as different types of data and searches may require different amounts of resources2.

B.

tcpdump

C.

splunk btool

A.

Rolling restart completes.

B.

Master node rejoins the cluster.

D.

A peer node joins or rejoins the cluster.

B.

Run the splunk apply shcluster-bundle command from the deployer.